Several social and/or ecological conditions can be recognized that would make a strict adherence to an independent (random) sex-determination mechanism, if not maladaptive, certainly nonadaptive. Some conditions should lead to parental control over sex determination being adaptive; in others it can be reasonably argued that no one sex-determining mechanism should be favored. The population structure, methods of mate choice, and breeding biology of the lesser snow goose are such that theory would predict a virtual absence of selective pressure maintaining an independent sex-determination mechanism. Such a situation should lead to more variance in the distribution of intraclutch sex ratios than predicted by the binomial model of independent sex determination. A large sample of goslings does show a sex-ratio distribution which closely fits the binomial, thus refuting the theoretical argument. It can be speculated that pleiotropic effects of sex-skew mutations place a selective disadvantage on such mutations or that such mutations are, for one reason or another, impossible.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harmsen et al. (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: