Key result
Critical glycemic control linked to ~115% higher NLR vs excellent control in elderly diabetics.
Why the study?
Elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) indicates inflammation and predicts cardiac and non-cardiac diseases, motivating evaluation of its relationship with indices of glucose control in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Is an elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio associated with poor glycemic control in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Observational (n=330)
Is an elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio associated with poor glycemic control in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Absolute Event Rate: 4.3% vs 2%
p-value: p=< 0.001
In elderly patients with type 2 diabetes, an elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is an independent predictor of poor glycemic control.
May inform inflammation-based risk assessment in elderly DM2; hypothesis-generating and should not change practice without further evidence.
An elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is an indicator of inflammatory processes and predicts the development of various cardiac diseases and non-cardiac disorders. Objective. To evaluate the relationship between NLR and various indices of glucose control in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2). Materials and methods. The observational study was conducted from September 2022 to February 2023. The study included 330 patients with DM2, were randomly assigned to three groups based on disease control: group 1 – glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level ≤7% (excellent control); group 2 – HbA1c from 7.0 to 9.0% (poor control); group 3 – HbA1c ≥9% (critical control). Patients' condition was assessed based on complete blood count and C-reactive protein levels. Results. When compared with the excellent control group (group 1), patients with the worst control (group 3) had significantly higher leukocyte (p < 0.001) and neutrophil (p < 0.003) counts, as well as lower lymphocyte (p = 0.44) levels. At the same time, no significant differences were found among patients with poor control (group 2) with patients with excellent disease control (group 1). The NLR parameter increased significantly in the worst control group (group 3) compared with the poor (group 2) and excellent (group 1) diabetes control groups: 4.3±2.8, 2.7±1.0, and 2.0±0.5, respectively (p < 0.001). NLR was found to be an independent predictor of poor diabetes control, along with fasting glucose and C-reactive protein. Conclusions. An increase in NLR is associated with an increase in HbA1c and inadequate glycemic control in patients with DM2. This indicator can serve as a useful tool for health monitoring in the process of monitoring patients with DM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kochetkova et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (n=330). Critical glycemic control (HbA1c ≥9%) vs. Excellent glycemic control (HbA1c ≤7%) was evaluated on Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (p=< 0.001). Critical glycemic control (HbA1c ≥9%) in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes was associated with a significantly higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio compared to excellent control (4.3 vs 2.0; p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: