Why the study?
The increase in myocardial perfusion scintigraphy procedures recommended by NICE requires expansion of qualified non-medical professionals to supervise stress testing, necessitating clear training guidelines and competence standards.
Provides training guidelines and competency standards for non-medical professionals to supervise myocardial perfusion scintigraphy stress testing.
Enables safe NHS expansion of MPS stress testing via trained non-medical staff; extends competency standards for allied health professionals in nuclear cardiology.
The suggestion by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) to more than triple the number of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) procedures carried out by the NHS each year is a challenge both in terms of numbers of gamma cameras available to carry out the scans and qualified staff to supervise stress tests. In the past, exercise and pharmacological stress testing have been supervised only by doctors but, increasingly, this is taken on by suitably trained non-medical professionals such as nurses, radiographers and clinical technologists. The expansion of the numbers of non-medical professionals qualified to supervise stress testing will be key to meeting NICE's recommendations. This paper sets out how potential new stressors should be identified, what their training should cover and discusses the standards of competence they should meet. It provides guidelines for training non-medical stressors to perform a safe and efficient stress test during MPS and advice for maintaining competency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jones et al. (2007) conducted a review in Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) stress testing. Training guidelines for non-medical professionals was evaluated. This paper provides guidelines for training non-medical professionals to safely and efficiently supervise myocardial perfusion scintigraphic stress testing to meet NHS expansion needs.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: