Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a risk factor for asthma exacerbations and is associated with greater clinical severity. Discrepancies may exist between CRS clinical diagnosis and data from paranasal sinus (PS) X-ray or computed tomography (CT) scans. The objective was to compare PS involvement using low-dose CT and plain X-ray in allergic asthmatic patients with rhinitis. METHODS: Patients underwent PS radiography in the frontal and mentonian positions and low-dose CT consisting of six to eight coronal scans performed on the central region of the sphenoidal, ethmoidal, maxillary, and frontal sinuses. Possible results for each sinus were a normal aspect or the presence of mucosal thickening, opacification, and/or air-fluid level. RESULTS: Eighty-five (93.4%) of 91 study patients had radiological changes on radiography or CT. In only six (6.6%) were both tests normal. The maxillary was the most involved sinus by both methods. Simultaneous PS abnormalities were observed in 40.5% on X-ray and 56.7% on CT. For the frontal, ethmoidal, and sphenoidal sinuses, the proportion of normal results differed significantly between X-ray and CT: 80.2% versus 89%, 76.9% versus 63.7% and 96.7% versus 70.3%, respectively (p <.05). Agreement was over 70% for the maxillary and frontal sinuses. CT also provided a better diagnosis of air-fluid level changes than X-ray. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose CT significantly showed larger number of normal PS results and diagnosed more severe PS lesions. As the determination of true sinus severity lesion impacts in asthma control, low-dose CT may replace PS plain X-ray and conventional CT to support better clinical decisions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stelmach et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: