Key result
Fusion-based detector reduces severe bradycardia detection delay by ~3 seconds vs. standard NICU monitors.
Why the study?
In very preterm infants, cardio-respiratory events and hypoxemia carry severe risks, and the authors sought to improve automatic early bradycardia detection under real-life conditions without altering performance compared to commonly used NICU monitors.
Does a decentralized fusion-based early bradycardia detector reduce detection delay compared to standard NICU monitors in preterm infants?
Observational (n=52)
Yes
Does a decentralized fusion-based early bradycardia detector reduce detection delay compared to standard NICU monitors in preterm infants?
Mean Difference: -2.9
Absolute Event Rate: 9.8% vs 12.7%
p-value: p=<0.05
A novel early bradycardia detector significantly reduced detection delay by 2.9 seconds in preterm infants without compromising sensitivity or false alarm rates compared to standard monitors.
Hypothesis-generating for fusion monitoring in preterm infants; prospective outcome trials needed before clinical adoption.
In very preterm infants, cardio-respiratory events and associated hypoxemia occurring during early postnatal life have been associated with risks of retinopathy, growth alteration and neurodevelopment impairment. These events are commonly detected by continuous cardio-respiratory monitoring in neonatal intensive care units (NICU), through the associated bradycardia. NICU nurse interventions are mainly triggered by these alarms. In this work, we acquired data from 52 preterm infants during NICU monitoring, in order to propose an early bradycardia detector which is based on a decentralized fusion of three detectors. The main objective is to improve automatic detection under real-life conditions without altering performance with respect to that of a monitor commonly used in NICU. We used heart rate lower than 80 bpm during at least 10 sec to define bradycardia. With this definition we observed a high rate of false alarms (64%) in real-life and that 29% of the relevant alarms were not followed by manual interventions. Concerning the proposed detection method, when compared to current monitors, it provided a significant decrease of the detection delay of 2.9 seconds, without alteration of the sensitivity (97.6% vs 95.2%) and false alarm rate (63.7% vs 64.1%). We expect that such an early detection will improve the response of the newborn to the intervention and allow for the development of new automatic therapeutic strategies which could complement manual intervention and decrease the sepsis risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Doyen et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Apnea of prematurity and bradycardia (n=52). Fusion-based early bradycardia detector vs. Standard NICU monitor (Philips IntelliVue MP20) was evaluated on Detection delay for severe bradycardia (HR < 80 bpm for ≥ 10 seconds) (MD -2.9 seconds, p=<0.05). The fusion-based early bradycardia detector significantly decreased the mean detection delay by 2.9 seconds compared to standard NICU monitors for severe bradycardia events.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: