Research Article| May 01, 1995 Mid-Miocene propagation of the Yellowstone mantle plume head beneath the Columbia River basalt source region Victor E. Camp Victor E. Camp 1Department of Geological Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, California 92182 Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Geology (1995) 23 (5): 435–438. https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1995)023<0435:MMPOTY>2.3.CO;2 Article history first online: 02 Jun 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Victor E. Camp; Mid-Miocene propagation of the Yellowstone mantle plume head beneath the Columbia River basalt source region. Geology 1995;; 23 (5): 435–438. doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1995)023<0435:MMPOTY>2.3.CO;2 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyGeology Search Advanced Search Abstract Columbia River flood-basalt volcanism is the product of mid-Miocene distortion of the Yellowstone mantle plume head against the Precambrian margin of North America. The overall migration pattern of Columbia River basalt vents reflects northward propagation of the plume head beneath the west-southwest–migrating North American plate. Thermal uplift mimics the vent migration. Over the 1.5 m.y. of Grande Ronde basalt extrusion, the projected crest of the plume head migrated 105 km (7 cm/yr), from the Chief Joseph dike swarm east-oortheast into the Clearwater embayment, where uplift occurred over the same period at a rate of 0.67 mm/yr. Chemical variations reflect progressive melting of the plume and mantle lithosphere, followed by the mixing of these components with an enriched source from the overriding craton. Rapid thickening of the plume head against the cratonic margin led to decompressional melting and magma rise beneath a thin oceanic lithosphere of accreted terranes. This content is PDF only. Please click on the PDF icon to access. First Page Preview Close Modal You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Victor E. Camp (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: