Computational study reveals systematic errors in G2-calculated enthalpies of cyclic hydrocarbons, indicating error scales linearly with double bonds.
With the purpose of exploring the reliability of the enthalpies of formation calculated using G2 methods, we have examined a series of saturated and unsaturated alicyclic hydrocarbons varying the size and the number of formal double bonds in the molecule. Heats of formation have been calculated at the G2(MP2) and G2 levels through both atomization reactions and bond separation isodesmic reactions, and comparison with experimental values has been made. A linear relationship between the differences between experimental and calculated (from atomization reactions) heats of formation and the number of formal double bonds is obtained.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Notario et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: