Background: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) that causes coronavirus diseases 2019 (COVID-19) is mainly spread person-to-person through droplets and aerosols. It is often recommended that healthcare workers and other people take precautionary measures to reduce their exposure to SARS-CoV-2 by wearing masks. However, the effectiveness of the masks is not well understood at the community level. Methods: To assess the effectiveness of the masks against the SARS-CoV-2 virus, we searched electronic databases (Pubmed, Scopus, and Web of Science) for studies that assessed mask or respirator effectiveness in the prevention of SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Results: The majority of studies reviewed suggested that all types of masks (e.g., N95 respirators, surgical masks, and cloth masks) protect the human respiratory system against airborne viral pathogens, such as SARS-CoV-2. The quality and effectiveness of the masks vary depending on the materials, structures, and methods used for construction. The data shows that both surgical masks and N95 respirators can provide similar protection against airborne respiratory infections, including SARS-CoV-2, for healthcare workers, but due to its better facial fit, N95 is recommended for high-risk environments. However, although masks reduce the spread of SARS-CoV-2, they may not entirely provide proper protection against biologic particles, which are considerably smaller than the accepted most penetrating particle size used in certification tests. Conclusion: While all types of masks have technical pros and cons, wearing them correctly can significantly improve their effectiveness since a complete seal of respiratory particles is unlikely due to side leakage of aerosols of different sizes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chacha M Issarow (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: