Key result
NMES increases 6MWD by ~5 meters and improves QOL versus voluntary exercise in liver cirrhosis.
Why the study?
Limb muscle dysfunction in liver cirrhosis causes severe physical deconditioning and impairs quality of life, prompting evaluation of therapeutic exercise modalities.
Does neuromuscular electrical stimulation improve exercise performance and quality of life compared to exercises in patients with liver cirrhosis?
RCT (n=60)
Odd/even admission numbers
No
Does neuromuscular electrical stimulation improve exercise performance and quality of life compared to exercises in patients with liver cirrhosis?
Absolute Event Rate: 162.67% vs 157.53%
p-value: p=0.001
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation is more effective than standard exercises in improving exercise performance and quality of life in patients with liver cirrhosis.
Supports NMES over voluntary exercise for functional gains in cirrhosis; extends non-volitional training options in deconditioned liver disease.
Introduction Patients with cirrhosis experience severe physical deconditioning, sarcopenia, physical frailty, fatigue, and malnutrition. Exercise capacity is limited owing to inactivity, bed rest, obesity, or cachexia. Limb muscle dysfunction has important consequences for patients with liver cirrhosis because it contributes to exercise limitation and reduces daily activities and social life, leading to a quality of life (QOL) impairment, greater utilization of social and health resources, and a worse prognosis. The study purpose was to compare the effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) and exercises on treatment of patients with liver cirrhosis. Methods A total of 60 patients (41 males and 19 females) with liver cirrhosis, aged 35–59 years, were randomly assigned to 2 groups: an NMES group (n = 30) and exercises group (n = 30). The intervention was implemented 3 times per week for 3 months. Exercise performance and QOL were measured before and after the intervention. Results Before treatment, there was no significant difference in exercise performance or QOL between the 2 groups; however, after 3 months of intervention, a significant difference in exercise performance was observed between the 2 groups (p = 0.001). Both groups improved their QOL (p = 0.001), but the NMES group improved more than the exercise group. Conclusions NMES is an important technique to increase exercise performance and QOL in patients with liver cirrhosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Manal K. Youssef (2022) conducted an RCT in Liver cirrhosis (n=60). Neuromuscular electrical stimulation vs. Exercises (30 minutes, 3 times per week) was evaluated on 6-minute walk distance (6MWd) (p=0.001). Neuromuscular electrical stimulation significantly improved 6-minute walk distance (162.67m vs 157.53m, p=0.001) and quality of life compared to voluntary exercise in patients with liver cirrhosis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: