Key result
Supported home-based progressive resistance exercise training did not significantly improve flow-mediated dilatation at 3 or 6 months compared to usual care in men who had undergone robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Why the study?
The study evaluated the effects of supported home-based progressive resistance exercise training on cardiovascular health, muscular strength, and quality of life in prostate cancer patients after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Does supported home-based progressive resistance exercise training improve brachial artery flow-mediated dilatation in prostate cancer patients after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy?
RCT (n=42)
Single-blind
Computer-generated block randomization
No
Does supported home-based progressive resistance exercise training improve brachial artery flow-mediated dilatation in prostate cancer patients after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy?
Mean Difference: 0.2 (95% CI -0.8–1.2)
p-value: p=0.7
A 6-month home-based progressive resistance exercise program did not improve endothelial function (FMD) but significantly improved aerobic capacity, muscular strength, body composition, and quality of life in men recovering from robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of a supported home-based progressive resistance exercise training (RET) programme on indices of cardiovascular health, muscular strength and health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients after treatment with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). METHODS: This study was a single-site, two-arm randomised controlled trial, with 40 participants randomised to either the intervention or control group over a 10-month period. In addition to receiving usual care, the intervention group completed three weekly RET sessions using resistance bands for 6 months. Participants performed 3 sets of 12-15 repetitions for each exercise, targeting each major muscle group. The control group received usual care only. Brachial artery flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) was the primary outcome and assessed at baseline, 3 and 6 months. Secondary outcomes included body weight, body fat, aerobic fitness, strength and blood-borne biomarkers associated with cardiometabolic risk. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the groups in FMD at 3 or 6 months. However, there were improvements in aerobic exercise capacity (P < 0.01) and upper- (P < 0.01) and lower-limb (P = 0.01) strength in favour of the RET group at 6 months, accompanied by greater weight loss (P = 0.04) and a reduction in body fat (P = 0.02). Improvements in HRQoL were evident in the RET group at 3 and 6 months via the PCa-specific component of the FACT-P questionnaire (both P < 0.01). Five adverse events and one serious adverse event were reported throughout the trial duration. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that home-based RET is an effective and safe mode of exercise that elicits beneficial effects on aerobic exercise capacity, muscular strength and HR-QoL in men who have undergone RARP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN10490647.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ashton et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Prostate cancer post-robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (n=42). Supported home-based progressive resistance exercise training vs. Usual care was evaluated on Brachial artery flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) at 3 months (MD 0.2, 95% CI -0.8, 1.2, p=0.7). Supported home-based progressive resistance exercise training did not significantly improve flow-mediated dilatation at 3 or 6 months compared to usual care in men who had undergone robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: