Why the study?
Assessing the anatomical criteria for right anterior mini-thoracotomy typically relies on manual 2D image analysis, motivating the development of a semi-automatic tool to assess these criteria and generate 3D anatomical models.
Does the RT-PLAN semi-automatic tool provide comparable anatomical assessment to standard manual 2D procedures for selecting patients for right anterior mini-thoracotomy?
Observational (n=25)
Does the RT-PLAN semi-automatic tool provide comparable anatomical assessment to standard manual 2D procedures for selecting patients for right anterior mini-thoracotomy?
The RT-PLAN semi-automatic tool is feasible and effectively assesses anatomical criteria for right anterior mini-thoracotomy, showing strong agreement with standard manual 2D procedures.
Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement is performed by mini-sternotomy (MS) or less invasive right anterior mini-thoracotomy (RT). The possibility of adopting RT is assessed by anatomical criteria derived from manual 2D image analysis. We developed a semi-automatic tool (RT-PLAN) to assess the criteria of RT, extract other parameters of surgical interest and generate a view of the anatomical region in a 3D space. Twenty-five 3D CT images from a dataset were retrospectively evaluated. The methodology starts with segmentation to reconstruct 3D surface models of the aorta and anterior rib cage. Secondly, the RT criteria and geometric information from these models are automatically and quantitatively evaluated. A comparison is made between the values of the parameters measured by the standard manual 2D procedure and our tool. The RT-PLAN procedure was feasible in all cases. Strong agreement was found between RT-PLAN and the standard manual 2D procedure. There was no difference between the RT-PLAN and the standard procedure when selecting patients for the RT technique. The tool developed is able to effectively perform the assessment of the RT criteria, with the addition of a realistic visualisation of the surgical field through virtual reality technology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Capellini et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (n=25). RT-PLAN semi-automatic tool vs. Standard manual 2D procedure was evaluated on Agreement between RT-PLAN and standard manual 2D procedure for selecting patients for RT technique.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: