Key result
Type 2 diabetes linked to higher risk of NAFLD and its progression.
Why the study?
The cause-effect relationship between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and insulin resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus remains unclear, necessitating further diagnostic focus.
This review highlights the bidirectional relationship between NAFLD and insulin resistance, emphasizing the need for close monitoring of patients with T2DM for NAFLD progression.
May prompt earlier NAFLD evaluation in T2DM; leaves open whether screening improves hard outcomes.
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are pathological conditions that are co-occurring, and have been reaching epidemic proportions. One of the most significant risk factors for the development of both T2DM and NAFLD is obesity, which increases existing insulin resistance (IR). IR thought to be one of the main pathogenic causes linking T2DM and NAFLD. In recent years, there has been increased interest in obtaining non-invasive methods for assessing fibrosis and determining indications for liver biopsy, such as the NAFLD fibrosis score, extended liver fibrosis panel, and transient elastography. However, liver biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosing NAFLD. Given that patients with T2DM are at higher risk of NAFLD than the general population, and that the presence of diabetes is a risk factor for the progression of NAFLD, patients with T2DM should be more closely monitored by clinicians. The present review paper is devoted to the search for causeeffect relationships of concurrent diseases such as NAFLD and disorders of carbohydrate metabolism, and priority areas of diagnosis of NAFLD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mishina et al. (2017) conducted a review in Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Patients with type 2 diabetes are at higher risk of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and its progression, necessitating closer clinical monitoring.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: