Key result
Complete ablation of macroreentry regions is linked to ~69% fewer repeat ablations vs incomplete sets.
Why the study?
Approximately one-third of patients undergoing artificial intelligence-guided ablation for persistent AF experienced atrial tachycardia recurrences, with unclear mechanisms and ablation adherence impact.
Does complete ablation of common macroreentry AT regions reduce repeat ablations in patients with persistent AF undergoing AI-guided ablation?
Cohort (n=96)
Does complete ablation of common macroreentry AT regions reduce repeat ablations in patients with persistent AF undergoing AI-guided ablation?
Strategic completion of dispersion-based ablation in common macroreentry regions significantly reduces the prevalence of atrial tachycardias and the need for repeat procedures in patients with persistent AF.
May support completing ablation in common macroreentry regions to reduce repeat procedures in persistent AF; leaves open need for prospective confirmation.
BACKGROUND: The TAILORED-AF randomized trial demonstrated that artificial intelligence-guided ablation of spatiotemporal dispersion in addition to pulmonary vein isolation significantly reduced atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence at 1-year follow-up in patients with persistent AF. Still, approximately one-third of the population experienced atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrences, most of which were successfully ablated. OBJECTIVE: In this post hoc analysis of the TAILORED-AF trial, we determined the exact mechanism and locations of ATs and examined the adherence to protocol-recommended ablation and its relation to the occurrence of ATs. METHODS: During index procedures, post-AF ATs were diagnosed based on common mapping and pacing maneuvers. Maps pertaining to activation and ablation lesions were evaluated by a panel of experts to assess compliance and completion of the TAILORED-AF protocol recommendations. RESULTS: During the index procedure, 140 ATs (96 patients) were characterized including 76 macroreentrant ATs (29% perimitral, 42% peritricuspid, 20% roof dependent, 9% other), 37 localized ATs, 12 ATs with undetermined mechanisms, and 15 unstable ATs. The percentage of repeat ablations was significantly lower in patients who had a complete ablation set in common macroreentry AT regions (roof, mitral) ablation than patients with an incomplete ablation set (22% vs 48%; P = .02; odds ratio 0.31; 95% confidence interval 0.12-0.79). CONCLUSION: Most ATs observed after artificial intelligence-guided, dispersion-based catheter ablation are targetable. The prevalence of these ATs and the repeat procedure rate are reduced when strategic completion of dispersion-based ablation was obtained.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deisenhofer et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Persistent atrial fibrillation (n=96). Complete ablation set in common macroreentry AT regions vs. Incomplete ablation set was evaluated on Repeat ablations (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.12-0.79, p=.02). A complete ablation set in common macroreentry regions significantly reduced the rate of repeat ablations compared to an incomplete ablation set (22% vs 48%; OR 0.31; 95% CI 0.12-0.79; P=0.02).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: