Why the study?
Heart teams deliver optimal, patient-centred care and minimize referral bias for complex cardiovascular diseases, but they can be challenging to coordinate, especially in acute settings.
This joint position paper provides structured guidance on implementing multidisciplinary heart teams to optimize care for patients with complex coronary artery disease.
Endorses heart team models for complex CAD; extends prior consensus with practical implementation guidance.
Contemporary cardiovascular medicine is complex, dynamic, and interactive. Therefore, multidisciplinary dialogue between different specialists is required to deliver optimal and patient-centred care. This has led to the concept of explicit collaborations of different specialists caring for patients with complex cardiovascular diseases-that is 'heart teams'. These teams are particularly valuable to minimize referral bias and improve guideline adherence as so to be responsive to patient preferences, needs, and values but may be challenging to coordinate, especially in the acute setting. This position paper-jointly developed by four cardiovascular associations-is intended to provide conceptual and practical considerations for the composition, structure, and function of multidisciplinary teams. It focuses on patients with complex coronary artery diseases in both elective and urgent setting and provide guidance on how to implement the heart team both in chronic and in acute coronary syndromes patients, including cases with mechanical complications and haemodynamic instability; it also discusses strategies for clear and transparent patient communication and provision of a patient-centric approach. Finally, gaps in evidence and research perspectives in this context are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leonardi et al. (2020) conducted a review in Complex coronary artery disease requiring myocardial revascularization. Heart teams (multidisciplinary teams) was evaluated. This joint position paper provides conceptual and practical considerations for the composition, structure, and function of multidisciplinary heart teams in managing complex coronary artery disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: