Key result
Ultra-fast operating room extubation linked to ~98% lower odds of prolonged ventilation vs standard ICU extubation.
Why the study?
Immediate extubation in the operating room following cardiac surgery remains controversial and its outcomes compared to standard ICU extubation are unclear.
Does immediate ultra-fast extubation in the operating room improve respiratory outcomes and reduce costs in patients undergoing minimally invasive heart valve surgery?
Cohort (n=615)
No
Does immediate ultra-fast extubation in the operating room improve respiratory outcomes and reduce costs in patients undergoing minimally invasive heart valve surgery?
Odds Ratio: 0.02 (95% CI 0.001–0.3)
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 18.9%
p-value: p=<0.01
Ultra-fast extubation in the operating room after minimally invasive valve surgery is clinically feasible, safe, improves respiratory outcomes, and reduces costs compared to standard ICU extubation.
May support ultra-fast extubation after minimally invasive valve surgery; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials.
Immediate extubation in the operating room (OR) following cardiac surgery remains controversial. In 2021, our institution implemented a fast-track protocol that incorporated ultra-fast extubation (ORE) for minimally invasive heart valve surgery. We retrospectively evaluated outcomes and cost-effectiveness in comparison to standard extubation in the ICU (ICE). We retrospectively reviewed 615 minimally invasive valve surgeries performed between 2019 and 2023. Among these, 228 patients were extubated in the ICU, if possible, within 6 h as per current guidelines, while 387 patients underwent immediate ultra-fast extubation in the operating room (ORE) at the end of the surgery. Baseline variables were compared, and case-control matching was performed based on significantly different factors: Age, BMI and cross clamp times, resulting in two matched groups of 122 each. After matching, baseline variables were comparable between groups. Patients who underwent ORE had shorter ICU and hospital stays, were less likely to require ventilation for more than 24 h, and had significantly less often respiratory failure. Rates of repeat intubation did not differ significantly between groups. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, ORE, aortic cross clamp time, and EuroSCORE II were independent predictors of prolonged ventilation (> 24 h). However, conversion to sternotomy, previous cardiac surgery, gender, and history of smoking were not significantly associated with prolonged ventilation. ORE also led to reduced costs (Standard mean difference: 10 247€, p = 0.03). Ultra-fast extubation after minimally invasive valve surgery was associated with improved respiratory outcomes and lower costs compared to standard extubation in the ICU, with no increase in re-intubation rates. These findings support the clinical feasibility and safety of OR extubation in selected patients at experienced centers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kruse et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Minimally invasive heart valve surgery (n=615). Ultra-fast extubation in the operating room (ORE) vs. Standard extubation in the ICU (ICE) was evaluated on Prolonged mechanical ventilation (> 24 h) (OR 0.02, 95% CI 0.001-0.3, p=<0.01). Ultra-fast extubation in the operating room after minimally invasive valve surgery significantly reduced the odds of prolonged mechanical ventilation compared to standard ICU extubation (OR 0.02).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: