Key result
PET-derived PTI predicts LV function recovery comparably to delayed contrast-enhanced CMR.
Why the study?
Early recognition of viable myocardium after AMI is clinically relevant, but the predictive value of PET-derived PTI compared to DCE-CMR for recovery of LV function was not established.
Does [15O]H2O PET-derived perfusable tissue index (PTI) predict recovery of LV function compared to DCE-CMR in STEMI patients after PCI?
Cohort (n=38)
No
Does [15O]H2O PET-derived perfusable tissue index (PTI) predict recovery of LV function compared to DCE-CMR in STEMI patients after PCI?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.82 (95% CI 0.76-0.88)
Absolute Event Rate: 0.82% vs 0.75%
p-value: p=0.14
PET-derived perfusable tissue index is a feasible alternative to DCE-CMR for assessing myocardial viability and predicting LV function recovery early after reperfused STEMI.
PTI from [15O]H2O PET may support post-AMI viability assessment; leaves open its role versus DCE-CMR in clinical practice.
Early recognition of viable myocardium after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is of clinical relevance, since affected segments have the potential of functional recovery. Delayed contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-CMR) has been validated extensively for the detection of viable myocardium. An alternative parameter for detecting viability is the perfusable tissue index (PTI), derived using [ 15 O]H 2 O positron emission tomography (PET), which is inversely related to the extent of myocardial scar (non-perfusable tissue). The aim of the present study was to investigate the predictive value of PTI on recovery of LV function as compared to DCE-CMR in patients with AMI, after successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Thirty-eight patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) successfully treated by PCI were prospectively recruited. Subjects were examined 1 week and 3 months (mean follow-up time: 97 ± 10 days) after AMI using [ 15 O]H 2 O PET and DCE-CMR to assess PTI, regional function and scar. Viability was defined as recovery of systolic wall thickening ≥3.0 mm at follow-up by use of CMR. A total of 588 segments were available for serial analysis. At baseline, 180 segments were dysfunctional and exhibited DCE. Seventy-three (41%) of these dysfunctional segments showed full recovery during follow-up (viable), whereas 107 (59%) segments remained dysfunctional (nonviable). Baseline PTI of viable segments was 0.94 ± 0.09 and was significantly higher compared to nonviable segments (0.80 ± 0.13, P < .001). The optimal cut-off value for PTI was ≥0.85 with a sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 72%, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.82. In comparison, a cut-off value of <32% for the extent of DCE resulted in a sensitivity of 72% and a specificity of 69%, and an AUC of 0.75 (AUC PTI vs DCE P = .14). Assessment of myocardial viability shortly after reperfused AMI is feasible using PET. PET-derived PTI yields a good predictive value for the recovery of LV function in PCI-treated STEMI patients, in excellent agreement with DCE-CMR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Timmer et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=38). Perfusable tissue index (PTI) by [15O]H2O PET vs. Delayed contrast-enhanced CMR (DCE-CMR) was evaluated on Prediction of myocardial viability (recovery of systolic wall thickening ≥3.0 mm at 3 months) (AUC 0.82, 95% CI 0.76-0.88, p=0.14). PET-derived perfusable tissue index (PTI) predicted recovery of left ventricular function with an AUC of 0.82, which was comparable to delayed contrast-enhanced CMR (AUC 0.75, p=0.14).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: