Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Global Health Department at Touro University California College of Osteopathic Medicine adapted its curriculum to deliver it virtually for the first time. We enrolled 25 first- and second-year medical students in a Global Health elective of 12 sessions in the Spring of 2021. Students received pre-recorded video lectures and study materials for each session, followed by live interactions with international preceptors. We analyzed the effectiveness of virtual sessions and overall learning outcomes by using 1) a self-proctored multiple-choice quiz administered before and after each session for eight sessions and 2) true-false surveys at the end of each session for ten sessions. Students’ mean score on pre-session quizzes was 56.33% (standard deviation of 1.72%), with individual quiz scores ranging between 42.22% and 79.53%. However, after live interactions via Zoom, students performed significantly better, with a mean score of 89.55% (p <0.001, standard deviation of 1.78%) and individual quiz scores between 69.08% and 100%. When surveyed about their attitudes towards provided topics and study materials and confidence in discussing the topics and their future implications, students’ response was positive, between 95.8% and 99.3%, with an overall survey response rate of 96.7%. We believe that virtual learning provided an effective platform to address global health competencies during the COVID-19 pandemic. It can, therefore, be an effective model for maintaining the engagement of health science students in global health education.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bayardorj et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: