Key result
AI achieves ~95% sensitivity for opportunistic AAA detection on noncontrast CT.
Why the study?
The applicability and diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence for opportunistic screening of abdominal aortic aneurysm on noncontrast abdominal CT needed evaluation.
Does artificial intelligence accurately detect abdominal aortic aneurysms in noncontrast abdominal CT?
Systematic Review (n=355)
Does artificial intelligence accurately detect abdominal aortic aneurysms in noncontrast abdominal CT?
Effect estimate: mean sensitivity 95% (95% CI 100-87)
AI shows high sensitivity and specificity for opportunistic AAA detection on noncontrast CT, though current evidence is limited by high study heterogeneity and selection bias.
Supports opportunistic AAA detection on routine noncontrast CT; extends AI validation but heterogeneity and bias leave practice change open.
In this review, we focused on the applicability of artificial intelligence (AI) for opportunistic abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) detection in computed tomography (CT). We used the academic search system PubMed as the primary source for the literature search and Google Scholar as a supplementary source of evidence. We searched through 2 February 2022. All studies on automated AAA detection or segmentation in noncontrast abdominal CT were included. For bias assessment, we developed and used an adapted version of the QUADAS-2 checklist. We included eight studies with 355 cases, of which 273 (77%) contained AAA. The highest risk of bias and level of applicability concerns were observed for the "patient selection" domain, due to the 100% pathology rate in the majority (75%) of the studies. The mean sensitivity value was 95% (95% CI 100-87%), the mean specificity value was 96.6% (95% CI 100-75.7%), and the mean accuracy value was 95.2% (95% CI 100-54.5%). Half of the included studies performed diagnostic accuracy estimation, with only one study having data on all diagnostic accuracy metrics. Therefore, we conducted a narrative synthesis. Our findings indicate high study heterogeneity, requiring further research with balanced noncontrast CT datasets and adherence to reporting standards in order to validate the high sensitivity value obtained.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kodenko et al. (2022) conducted a systematic review in Abdominal aortic aneurysm (n=355). Artificial intelligence (AI) was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, accuracy) (mean sensitivity 95%, 95% CI 100-87). Artificial intelligence for opportunistic abdominal aortic aneurysm detection in noncontrast CT demonstrated a mean sensitivity of 95% (95% CI 100-87%) and mean specificity of 96.6%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: