Key result
Rheumatic mitral pathology is linked to ~288% higher risk of progressive dysfunction vs non-rheumatic pathology.
Why the study?
Surgical management of the mitral valve in patients with mild-to-moderate mitral dysfunction undergoing aortic valve replacement remains controversial.
Cohort (n=292)
No
Hazard Ratio: 3.88 (95% CI 1.6–9.39)
Absolute Event Rate: 21% vs 8%
p-value: p=0.003
Conservative management of mild-to-moderate mitral dysfunction during aortic valve replacement yields acceptable clinical outcomes, though rheumatic etiology is a strong predictor of subsequent mitral valve progression.
Rheumatic mitral pathology may warrant closer post-AVR surveillance; observational data leaves open etiology-specific management trials.
BACKGROUND: Surgical management of the mitral valve (MV) in patients with mild-to-moderate mitral dysfunction undergoing aortic valve replacement is still controversial. We investigated the echocardiographic data from patients with mild-to-moderate mitral dysfunction who did not undergo MV surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 1989 to June 2012, a total of 2731 patients underwent aortic valve replacement. Among these, 560 patients with mild-to-moderate mitral dysfunction were screened. Of these, 292 patients (61.9 ± 13.0 years; 113 females) who had not undergone MV surgery formed our study cohort. Survival, valve-related complication, and echocardiographic data were evaluated. RESULTS: There were three early deaths. During the mean follow-up period of 56.9 ± 46.5 months, there were 23 late deaths and 28 valve-related complications. Valve-related event-free survival at 5 years was 85.9% ± 2.4%. In serial postoperative echocardiographic evaluations (mean follow-up duration: 40.8 ± 44.5 months), 21 patients experienced a progression in late mitral dysfunction. At 5 years, 88.8% ± 2.7% of patients did not suffer from late mitral dysfunction. Based on multivariate analysis, rheumatic pathology of MV (Hazard Ratio: 3.88, 95% confidence intervals 1.60-9.39, p = 0.003) was an independent predictor of late mitral dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Conservatively treated patients with mild-to-moderate mitral dysfunction exhibited acceptable clinical outcomes. Rheumatic pathology of MV is associated with a higher risk of progressive native MV dysfunction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Mild-to-moderate mitral dysfunction in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (n=292). Rheumatic pathology of the mitral valve vs. Non-rheumatic pathology of the mitral valve was evaluated on Late mitral dysfunction (progression in severity) (HR 3.88, 95% CI 1.60-9.39, p=0.003). Rheumatic pathology of the mitral valve was associated with a significantly higher risk of progressive native mitral valve dysfunction compared to non-rheumatic pathology (HR 3.88).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: