Key result
Geriatric co-management is linked to a ~49% shorter stay beyond fit-for-discharge after vascular surgery.
Why the study?
The UK's aging population is expected to increase the prevalence of PAD and burden on vascular teams, necessitating evaluation of geriatric co-management impact on vascular surgery outcomes.
Does geriatric co-management (POPS team) reduce length of stay in patients undergoing vascular surgery?
Cohort
Does geriatric co-management (POPS team) reduce length of stay in patients undergoing vascular surgery?
Absolute Event Rate: 6% vs 11.7%
Geriatric co-management for vascular surgery patients significantly reduces length of stay and the need for medical specialty referrals.
May support geriatric co-management in vascular surgery; extends observational data but leaves open need for RCTs.
INTRODUCTION: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) involves atherosclerotic stenosis and occlusion of lower leg arteries, leading to significant disability, high cardiovascular and cerebrovascular morbidity and mortality. Critical limb ischemia (CLI) is the most severe form of PAD. With the UK's aging population set to increase, the prevalence of PAD and the burden on vascular teams are expected to rise. This study evaluates the impact of regular input from the Proactive Care of Older People Undergoing Surgery (POPS) team on vascular surgery outcomes. METHODS: This prospective cohort study examined the impact of Care of the Elderly (CoE) input on predefined parameters, focussing primarily on the length of stay (LoS) over 12 months. Data included baseline demographics, comorbidities, frailty scores (assessed using the Rockwood frailty score), LoS and referrals to medical specialties. A retrospective pilot study of 50 consecutive patients indicated a need for CoE input, showing higher local LoS compared with the national average. RESULTS: Patients in both pilot and project groups were matched for comorbidities, frailty scores and interventions. Despite higher mean age and a greater proportion of patients aged 75+ years in the project group, the study aimed to reduce LoS. Post-quality improvement project implementation, LoS beyond fit-for-discharge decreased from 11.7 days to 9 days in 6 months and to 6 days after 12 months. Referrals to medical specialties decreased from 77% to 40%, and new diagnoses on discharge increased from 28% to 37%. CONCLUSIONS: CoE team input in vascular surgery patient care significantly improved outcomes, reducing LoS and medical specialty referrals, demonstrating cost-effectiveness and suggesting a feasible multidisciplinary approach for other regions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bakheet et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) requiring vascular surgery. Proactive Care of Older People Undergoing Surgery (POPS) team / Care of the Elderly (CoE) input vs. Retrospective pilot group (standard care) was evaluated on Length of stay (LoS) beyond fit-for-discharge. Geriatric co-management (POPS team input) for vascular surgery patients reduced length of stay beyond fit-for-discharge from 11.7 days to 6 days after 12 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: