Key result
Dyslipidemia, procedure duration, and graft type predict EVAR fluoroscopy times exceeding 1011 seconds.
Why the study?
Patients undergoing endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) may require prolonged radiation exposure affected by several factors.
What factors influence fluoroscopy time during endovascular treatment of abdominal aneurysms?
Observational (n=180)
What factors influence fluoroscopy time during endovascular treatment of abdominal aneurysms?
Patient comorbidities, aneurysm size, procedure duration, and specific graft types are significant predictors of increased fluoroscopy time during EVAR, highlighting areas for radiation protection optimization.
Patients who undergo endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) may require prolonged radiation exposure affected by several factors. The objectives of this study were to document fluoroscopy time (FT) during EVAR and identify possible factors that influence it. A retrospective analysis of a 180 patients' database with abdominal infrarenal aortic aneurysms submitted to EVAR during a 7-y period was performed. The FT is evaluated regarding risk factors and comorbidities, graft type and patient-related, clinical and technical parameters. FT's median (interquartile range) was 1011 (698-1500) s. Excluder and C3 Excluder were associated with significantly lower FT values when compared with other grafts. Hypertension, dyslipidemia, age ≥ 70 y, maximum aneurysm diameter ≥ 6 cm and procedure duration ≥2 h resulted in higher FT values. A significantly lower FT was found for the operations performed in the 7th y of the study's period compared with the previous 6 y, mainly because of the use of Excluder or C3 Excluder grafts. However, these grafts did not show any significant difference in FT values during the 7 y. A significant correlation between FT with age and procedure duration was found. Nevertheless, procedure duration is a poor FT predictor in linear and logistic regressions, although is significantly correlated with FT. Dyslipidemia, procedure duration and graft type are independent predictors of FT larger than the median, whereas only the procedure duration is a predictor for FT larger than the 75th percentile value. The identified factors regarding radiation protection issues should be considered when contemplating abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, however, without compromising the procedure's efficacy. Further work is necessary to identify more potential anatomical, clinical and technical factors affecting procedures' complexity and FT and patient radiation dose during EVAR interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Efthymiou et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Abdominal infrarenal aortic aneurysms (n=180). Clinical, anatomical, and technical factors (e.g., graft type, dyslipidemia, procedure duration) was evaluated on Fluoroscopy time (FT). Dyslipidemia, procedure duration, and graft type were independent predictors of fluoroscopy time greater than the median (1011 seconds) during endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: