This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
OBJECTIVE: This is an observational study to explore possible changes in end-ileostomy stoma protrusion through years of modified surgical methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with permanent end-ileostomy were eligible for inclusion. Patients were recruited from two outpatient clinics in South-East Norway and from the Norwegian society for patients with ostomy (NORILCO). Stoma protrusion was measured in upright and supine positions by study nurse (outpatient cohort) or by the patient (NORILCO cohort). Clinical information was obtained through patients' questionnaire replies. For analyses, a pragmatic 24-hour ileostomy protrusion score was created, where 16/24 of upright measurement constituted protrusion during daytime and 8/24 of supine measurement protrusion at sleep. In both groups, there was some reduction in stoma protrusion from upright to supine position, from 2.5 cm upright in both groups to 2.0-2.2 cm supine. CONCLUSIONS: Stoma protrusion was positively associated with years since stoma was created, but not with surgical method (laparotomy or laparoscopy). A functional 24-hour protrusion score may reduce the effect of clustering of measurements due to end-digit preferences and a preoccupied focus on 2 cm as the tipping point for skin problems. Further and larger studies are needed with special attention to reduce selection bias.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jaioun et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: