Key result
Epicardial fat volume is ~43% higher in CAD versus CAE.
Why the study?
Epicardial fat may play an important role in CAD pathogenesis, prompting investigation into the relationship between coronary artery ectasia and epicardial fat volume.
Is epicardial fat volume associated with coronary artery ectasia and coronary artery disease?
Observational (n=1,506)
Is epicardial fat volume associated with coronary artery ectasia and coronary artery disease?
Absolute Event Rate: 87.94% vs 61.33%
p-value: p=< .001
Epicardial fat volume is significantly higher in patients with coronary artery disease compared to those with coronary artery ectasia or normal coronaries, serving as a stronger predictor for CAD.
Epicardial fat may play an important role in the pathogenesis of coronary artery disease (CAD). We investigated the relationship between coronary artery ectasia (CAE) and epicardial fat volume (EFV). This retrospective study included 506 patients with CAE (group 1), 500 with CAD (group 2), and 500 patients with normal coronaries as controls (group 3). The pericardium was traced manually from the edge of the pulmonary trunk to the last measured by computed tomography slice containing images of the heart to obtain a region of interest. EFV was significantly higher in patients with CAD than in those with CAE (87.94 ± 22.18 vs 61.33 ± 12.75 mL; P < .001). Patients with normal coronaries had EFV of 56.62 ± 9.82 mL. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that male gender [Odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval (CI)): 1.220 (1.015–1.682), P = .042], diabetes [OR (95% CI): 1.036 (1.008–1.057); P = .002], and smoking [OR (95% CI): 3.043 (1.022–9.462); P = .005] were significantly associated with CAE. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve showed that EFV had strongest diagnostic value for detecting CAD rather than CAE [AUC .502 P = .074 (95% CI: .311–.784)]. This study demonstrated that EFV is an independent predictor for CAE and CAD. However, sensitivity and specificity for detecting CAE is low when compared with CAD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Subhan et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Coronary artery ectasia and coronary artery disease (n=1,506). Epicardial fat volume vs. Coronary artery ectasia and normal coronaries was evaluated on Epicardial fat volume (p=< .001). Epicardial fat volume was significantly higher in patients with coronary artery disease compared to those with coronary artery ectasia (87.94 vs 61.33 mL; P<.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: