The oxidation of phenol at the platinum electrode was studied in aqueous acidic solutions. The effects of electrode surface oxide on the oxidation reactions of phenol and on electrode passivation by reaction products were investigated using cyclic voltammetry and chronoamperometry. X‐ray photoelectron spectrometry was used to detect changes in the nature of the passive film. Phenol reacted at both the inner and outer Helmholtz layers at platinum metal electrodes. Phenol in the inner Helmholtz layer is adsorbed irreversibly and is conductive. Its oxidation involves ring cleavage with a greater than 18 eq/mol. The outer Helmholtz layer reactions are characterized by rapid simple oxidations involving minimal rearrangement of the reactant molecule. This implies that once stable oxidized products such as benzoquinone and polymers with quinone or ether structures are formed they must move from the outer to the inner Helmholtz layer to be oxidized further by ring‐cleavage reactions. We postulate that the bulk of the initial current flow during phenol oxidation is due to the simple fast outer Helmholtz reactions. This initial current continues until the buildup of unreactive products blocks further outer Helmholtz reactions and the slower inner layer reactions predominate. This electrode behavior changed if the electrode was preoxidized producing a platinum oxide coating. The inner layer reactions were greatly reduced at a platinum oxide coated electrode resulting in lower passivated electrode current flow. The onset of passivation however was delayed at the oxide coated electrode. This is attributed to a weaker adsorption of reaction products at the electrode surface requiring additional reaction to produce a stable passive film. The final resulting passive films at platinum and platinum oxide electrodes were chemically similar based on x‐ray photoelectron spectrometric analysis but differed in thickness indicating that the electrode passivation is not due simply to the thickness of the passive film.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gattrell et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: