Key result
DALI and Liposorber D achieve a similar ~68% LDL reduction but differ in inflammatory effects.
Why the study?
The comparative effects of two recently introduced whole-blood LDL apheresis systems on lipoproteins and cardiovascular risk markers in severe hypercholesterolemia were not established.
Does the DALI LDL apheresis system compared to Liposorber D improve lipid lowering and cardiovascular risk markers in patients with severe hypercholesterolemia?
RCT (n=6)
cross-over
Does the DALI LDL apheresis system compared to Liposorber D improve lipid lowering and cardiovascular risk markers in patients with severe hypercholesterolemia?
Absolute Event Rate: 68.3% vs 68.4%
Both DALI and Liposorber D are highly effective for LDL apheresis, but they have differing effects on inflammatory and cardiovascular risk biomarkers.
Both systems offer equivalent LDL apheresis efficacy; extends evidence on their distinct inflammatory biomarker effects.
LDL apheresis is an extracorporal modality to lower the concentration of atherogenic lipoproteins, e.g., LDL cholesterol. We compared two recently introduced whole-blood LDL apheresis systems inpatients with hypercholesterolemia in a randomized cross-over trial with respect to their effects on lipoproteins as well as on other cardiovascular risk markers. Six patients (4 women, 2 men, median age 62.5 years, median BMI 25.9 kg/m(2)) on regular LDL apheresis were randomly assigned to receive six weekly treatments with either DALI (Fresenius) or Liposorber D (Kaneka). After 6 weeks, the patients were switched to the other device (again six weekly treatments). Blood was drawn before and immediately after LDL apheresis at three time points (last regular apheresis before the study; after six treatments with DALI and after six treatments with Liposorber D). LDL cholesterol concentration before the sixth apheresis (DALI 129 mg/dL, Liposorber D 132 mg/dL) as well as LDL cholesterol reduction during the sixth apheresis (DALI 68.3% and Liposorber D 68.4%) were similar with the two systems. CRP and fibrinogen concentrations were lower but interleukin-6, myeloperoxidase, and resistin concentrations were higher after the last Liposorber treatment compared with DALI (P < 0.05, respectively). No differences were observed concerning adiponectin, ghrelin, and PYY levels. In conclusion, both devices were highly effective in eliminating atherogenic lipoproteins. CRP and fibrinogen were better eliminated with Liposorber D. However, following Liposorber D, interleukin-6 levels were higher than after DALI possibly indicating an increased inflammatory activation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Otto et al. (2007) conducted an RCT in severe hypercholesterolemia (n=6). DALI vs. Liposorber D was evaluated on LDL cholesterol reduction during the sixth apheresis. DALI and Liposorber D achieved similar LDL cholesterol reductions (68.3% vs 68.4%), while Liposorber D resulted in lower CRP and fibrinogen but higher interleukin-6 levels (P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: