This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Integrating insect-derived ingredients into Western diets presents a sustainable protein alternative but encounters cultural resistance and spontaneous aversion. Assessing automatic reactions to insect-based foods remains challenging. Here, we psychometrically evaluated two indirect measures—the Brief Implicit Association Test (BIAT) and the Manikin Task—using visually similar insect-based and traditional burger stimuli differing only in branding. Across two studies (Study 1: recruited = 123, analyzed = 103; Study 2: recruited = 145, analyzed = 136), these tasks demonstrated acceptable-to-good reliability and captured distinct facets of spontaneous evaluative and approach-avoidance responses. While correlations between indirect and explicit measures were low, some associations aligned with theoretical expectations, indicating these tools assess automatic reactions beyond self-report. These findings provide a reliable toolkit for consumer research, facilitating a nuanced understanding of implicit attitudes toward insect-based foods. Both measures are suitable for online administration, enhancing their applicability in diverse research contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zogmaister et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: