Key result
DPP-4 inhibitors lower HbA1c by ~0.42% vs placebo in T2D with moderate-to-severe CKD.
Why the study?
Previous meta-analyses combined adjusted and unadjusted data to evaluate DPP-4 inhibitors in T2D patients with CKD, raising concerns about validity.
Do DPP-4 inhibitors improve HbA1c in type 2 diabetes patients with moderate to severe chronic kidney disease?
Meta-Analysis
Do DPP-4 inhibitors improve HbA1c in type 2 diabetes patients with moderate to severe chronic kidney disease?
Mean Difference: -0.42 (95% CI -0.54–-0.29)
DPP-4 inhibitors effectively lower HbA1c and induce fewer symptomatic hypoglycemic events compared to sulfonylureas in patients with type 2 diabetes and moderate to severe CKD.
Supports DPP-4 inhibitor use for glycemic control in T2D with moderate-severe CKD; extends evidence to advanced renal impairment.
BACKGROUND: Three meta-analyses recently evaluated the effects of dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, the combination of adjusted and unadjusted data in these meta-analyses may be questionable. The present study performed a meta-analysis of the effects of DPP-4 inhibitors in T2D patients with moderate to severe CKD using unadjusted data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: The PubMed, Embase (via Ovid), and Cochrane Central databases were searched for papers regarding the effects of DPP-4 inhibitors in CKD patients published before 1 August 2016. Data were independently extracted by two authors. A pooled analysis of unadjusted data was performed using random-effects models. RESULTS: Twelve studies representing 10 RCTs were included in the present analysis. Comparing mean HbA1c change between placebo and treatment, DPP-4 inhibitors significantly improved HbA1c levels at 12 weeks (mean difference [MD] -0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.54, -0.29), but improvements in HbA1c were seen only in dialysis patients at 24 weeks (MD -0.52; 95% CI -0.72, -0.32)*. Improvements in HbA1c were equivalent between DPP-4 inhibitors and sulfonylureas at 52 or 54 weeks. There were no significant differences in the incidence of severe or any hypoglycemic events between DPP-4 inhibitors and control (placebo or sulfonylureas) at 12, 24, and 52 or 54 weeks. However, DPP-4 inhibitors induced fewer symptomatic hypoglycemic events compared with sulfonylureas at 52 or 54 weeks. *[Correction added on 30 October 2017, after first online publication: The value '0.32' has been corrected to '-0.32'.] CONCLUSIONS: The present analysis shows that DPP-4 inhibitors are effective and comparable with sulfonylureas in T2D patients with moderate to severe CKD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2017) conducted a meta-analysis in Type 2 diabetes with moderate to severe chronic kidney disease. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors vs. Placebo or sulfonylureas was evaluated on Mean HbA1c change at 12 weeks (MD -0.42, 95% CI -0.54, -0.29). DPP-4 inhibitors significantly improved HbA1c levels at 12 weeks compared to placebo (MD -0.42; 95% CI -0.54, -0.29) in type 2 diabetes patients with moderate to severe chronic kidney disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: