Key result
MOTS-c injection improves insulin sensitivity and prevents fat accumulation in obese mice.
Why the study?
Whether the exercise mimetic MOTS-c changes plasma markers of metabolic dysfunction in diet-induced obese mice had not been examined.
Does MOTS-c improve plasma markers of metabolic dysfunction and insulin sensitivity in diet-induced obese mice?
Does MOTS-c improve plasma markers of metabolic dysfunction and insulin sensitivity in diet-induced obese mice?
MOTS-c improves insulin sensitivity and reduces fat accumulation in diet-induced obese mice by modulating specific metabolic pathways.
Hypothesis-generating in obese mice; leaves open translation to human metabolic therapy pending clinical trials.
MOTS-c is an exercise mimetic and improves insulin sensitivity in aged and diet-induced obese mice. Although plasma markers are good markers for the metabolic condition, whether MOTS-c changes plasma markers in diet-induced obese mice has not been examined. Here, we used an unbiased metabolomics approach to examine the effect of MOTS-c on plasma markers of metabolic dysfunction. We found that three pathways - sphingolipid metabolism, monoacylglycerol metabolism, and dicarboxylate metabolism - were reduced in MOTS-c-injected mice. Interestingly, these pathways are upregulated in obese and T2D models. MOTS-c improves insulin sensitivity and increases beta-oxidation to prevent fat accumulation in DIO mice through these pathways. These results provide us a better understanding of the mechanism of how MOTS-c improves insulin sensitivity and reduces the body weight and fatty liver and opens a new venue for further study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2019) studied Diet-induced obesity. MOTS-c was evaluated on Plasma markers of metabolic dysfunction. MOTS-c injection in diet-induced obese mice reduced sphingolipid, monoacylglycerol, and dicarboxylate metabolism pathways, improving insulin sensitivity and preventing fat accumulation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: