Key result
Study evaluates viral infections in infants with diarrhea but reports no quantitative results.
Why the study?
The etiology of infantile diarrhea often remains obscure, with unclear etiological significance of viruses in clinical manifestations of the disease.
Case-Control
No
IN SPITE of high prevalence, the etiology of infantile diarrhea often remains somewhat obscure. Fewer than one half of infants developing acute enteritis yield enterobacteriaceae of pathogenic significance. A significant fraction yields viruses, but the etiological significance of these agents has yet to be established as primarily responsible for the clinical manifestations of disease. Studies reported in the literature 1-9 are often at variance; excepting for studies of several enteroviruses in isolated outbreaks such as echovirus 18, 6 others have generally failed to provide convincing evidence of association between the virus and the disease. Therefore, we restudied the frequency of encountering viruses in diarrhea among infants and young children seen at the University of Kansas Medical Center. In this study a fairly comprehensive effort was made to recover viruses and to follow antibody responses in infants yielding viral agents. Materials and Methods Description of Diarrheal and Control Subjects. —This
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A. M. Behbehani (1966) conducted a case-control in Infantile diarrhea. Viral infection vs. Control subjects was evaluated on Frequency of encountering viruses and antibody responses. Viral infection frequency and antibody responses in infants with diarrhea were investigated, but the truncated abstract reports no quantitative results.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: