Key result
With Every Heartbeat is Life education improves CV health knowledge scores by ~14 points vs control.
Why the study?
Rural African Americans in the southern United States experience disproportionate CVD risk and mortality, and culturally relevant interventions to improve cardiovascular health knowledge are needed.
Does a cardiovascular health promotion intervention improve cardiovascular health knowledge and stages of change in rural participants?
RCT (n=229)
Cluster randomized
Yes
Does a cardiovascular health promotion intervention improve cardiovascular health knowledge and stages of change in rural participants?
Mean Difference: 14.49 (95% CI 9.38–19.61)
Absolute Event Rate: 94.52% vs 80.86%
p-value: p=<0.001
A culturally relevant cardiovascular health promotion intervention significantly improves cardiovascular health knowledge and behavioral stages of change among rural participants.
Supports culturally tailored CV education in rural settings; extends RCT evidence to knowledge gains and behavior change.
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a major cause of death and disability, especially among people living in the rural, southern United States. Rural African Americans are often diagnosed with CVD earlier in life, and they bear a disproportionate burden of CVD risk factors, morbidity, and mortality. Health equity among historically underserved, rural populations can potentially be attained through culturally relevant interventions that teach people skills to stay well and avoid CVD-related risk and diagnoses. The purpose of this secondary analysis was to determine the effect of an evidence-based intervention on cardiovascular health knowledge and the stages of change toward the action and maintenance phases. The pre-test-post-test data were obtained during a cluster randomized trial involving twelve rural churches that were randomized to intervention (n = 6) and control (n = 6) groups. Participants (n = 115) in the intervention group received a cardiovascular health intervention, and those (n = 114) in the control group could receive the intervention following the study’s completion. The data were analyzed using a linear mixed model to compare group differences from pre-test to post-test. The cardiovascular health promotion intervention significantly improved cardiovascular health knowledge and was associated with advancements in the stages of change toward the action and maintenance phases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abbott et al. (2018) conducted an RCT in Cardiovascular disease knowledge (n=229). With Every Heartbeat is Life cardiovascular health promotion program vs. Control group (delayed intervention) was evaluated on Overall cardiovascular health knowledge score (MD 14.49, 95% CI 9.38, 19.61, p=<0.001). The With Every Heartbeat is Life educational intervention significantly improved overall cardiovascular health knowledge scores by a mean difference of 14.49 points compared to the control group.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: