In countries such as Australia, New Zealand, and the United States, increasingly, social work is included in primary health care teams, but how it becomes meaningfully integrated into interprofessional team-based care remains insufficiently understood. This study employed a scoping review to synthesise how social work integrates into interprofessional primary health care teams, with particular emphasis on collaborative mechanisms and team-based workflows. Following Arksey and O’Malley's framework and PRISMA-ScR reporting, reviewers searched five major English-language databases, and included 31 articles. Thematic synthesis identified three broad patterns. These were embedding arrangements shaped by colocation and team infrastructure; collaboration mechanisms enacted through routinised meetings, continuous boundary work, and organisational enabling conditions; and team-based workflows in which social work was commonly activated by psychosocial complexity, but functional integration depended on explicit handoff scripts, shared documentation, and ethically governed information-sharing. Overall, integration emerged as an organisational accomplishment rather than simply a staffing decision. Durable embedding appeared to require repeatable access routes, coordination routines, and information systems that made social work consistently mobilisable and evaluable in everyday primary health care practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: