Key result
Transitioning from oral selexipag to parenteral prostacyclin analogues in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension improved hemodynamics but did not significantly improve overall risk status (p=0.098).
Why the study?
Pulmonary arterial hypertension remains progressive with poor outcomes despite therapy advances, and the role of transitioning from selexipag to parenteral prostacyclin analogues is not well defined.
Does transitioning from oral selexipag to parenteral prostacyclin analogues improve risk status and hemodynamics in patients with PAH?
Cohort (n=21)
Yes
Does transitioning from oral selexipag to parenteral prostacyclin analogues improve risk status and hemodynamics in patients with PAH?
p-value: p=0.098
Transitioning from oral selexipag to parenteral prostacyclin analogues in advanced PAH improves hemodynamics, though achieving low-risk status remains challenging and is strongly associated with better survival.
Extract Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) remains a progressive, incurable condition often associated with poor outcomes despite advances in therapy [1]. Selexipag, an oral selective prostacyclin receptor agonist, is associated with reduced hospitalisations and slower disease progression when added to an endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA) and/or a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor (PDE5i) in patients with PAH [2]. Current recommendations suggest the addition of selexipag for patients with an intermediate–low risk of mortality while receiving ERA/PDE5i therapy [3].
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
AlEissa et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) (n=21). Transition from oral selexipag to parenteral prostacyclin analogues vs. Pre-transition baseline was evaluated on Improvement in 2022 ESC/ERS risk stratification category (p=0.098). Transitioning from oral selexipag to parenteral prostacyclin analogues in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension improved hemodynamics but did not significantly improve overall risk status (p=0.098).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: