What does this research mean for the field?

Inferring ecological trends from resource user interviews is susceptible to inaccuracies caused by shifting baselines and memory illusions, which must be carefully accounted for in conservation assessments. Novelty: ClaimNovelty.INCREMENTAL. Consensus alignment: ConsensusAlignment.NEUTRAL.

November 18, 2010Animal ConservationOpen Access

Shifting baselines and memory illusions: what should we worry about when inferring trends from resource user interviews?

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Abstract

Shifting baselines and memory illusions -What should we worry about when inferring trends from resource user interviews?Commentary on O'Donnell, Pajaro & Vincent (2010) How does the accuracy of fisher knowledge affect seahorse conservation status?

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Tim M. Daw (2010) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aaa63d2ac6343f54cdfe707 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2010.00418.x

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Shifting baselines and memory illusions: what should we worry about when inferring trends from resource user interviews?

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Shifting baselines and memory illusions: what should we worry about when inferring trends from resource user interviews?

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading