Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study compares representative standard strong-base anion (SBA) and weak-base anion (WBA) exchangers, a bifunctional resin (A-530E), a class of polymeric ligand exchangers (PLEs), and an ion-exchange fiber (IXF) with respect to perchlorate sorption capacity, kinetics, and regenerability. While A-530E offered the greatest perchlorate capacity and selectivity, practically acceptable capacity was also observed for styrenic SBA and WBA resins, a PLE, and IXF. In contrast, polyacrylic resins offered much lower perchlorate capacity. The greater capacity of styrenic resins is attributed to enhanced ion-pairing and Lewis acid−base interaction due to the hydrophobic nature of polystyrene matrices and lower hydration energy of perchlorate. Conversely, regeneration of polyacrylic resins was much more efficient, and A-530E was least regenerable. IXF offered comparable perchlorate capacity to that of styrenic resins yet unparalleled kinetics (with a sorption equilibrium time of <1.5 h), and much greater regeneration efficiency, and WBA resins were much more regenerable than SBA resins.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xiong et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: