Key result
Gender bias, social determinants, and limited provider resources hinder cardiovascular care for women veterans.
Why the study?
Women veterans face unique barriers to cardiovascular disease screening, prevention, and diagnosis that differ from their male counterparts.
What are the barriers to screening, diagnosis, and prevention of cardiovascular disease in women veterans?
What are the barriers to screening, diagnosis, and prevention of cardiovascular disease in women veterans?
Identifying unique patient- and provider-level barriers to cardiovascular care in women veterans emphasizes the need for gender-specific tools and education to improve prevention and diagnosis.
May support gender-specific tools for women veterans; leaves open need for prospective validation before practice change.
INTRODUCTION: Veterans are known to be at high risk for cardiovascular disease. Women veterans are not only a part of this specialty group, but as they are women-they face some unique experiences and barriers to cardiovascular care that their male counterparts do not. The purpose of this article is to identify barriers as well as facilitators to screening, prevention, and diagnosis of cardiovascular care to women veterans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature review was conducted, utilizing the keywords "veterans" AND "female" AND "cardiovascular disease or heart disease" AND "screening or prevention or diagnosis" in CINAHL and PubMed; as well as a search in SCOPUS using "barriers" AND "veteran" AND "female" AND "Cardiovascular." RESULTS: Patient-level barriers included social determinant of health determinant issues, lack of social support, being unaware of their risk of cardiovascular disease or how to implement heart-healthy diet and exercise, and gender bias via the Veterans Affairs staff or provider. Provider level barriers included not having enough time with the patient, not having information on resources for women veterans that are available, the electronic medical record not having screening tools for the provider and patient to use together for discussion or not having the ability to communicate the risk education and recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: The gaps in care brought to light in this article make the case for patient and provider tools that include considerations such as mental health, gender-specific care, and education surrounding their risk status and how to access resources to implement healthy lifestyle changes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Taylor et al. (2025) conducted a review in Cardiovascular disease. Barriers to cardiovascular care was evaluated on Patient and provider level barriers to screening, prevention, and diagnosis. Patient-level barriers to cardiovascular care in women veterans included social determinants of health and gender bias, while provider-level barriers included lack of time and resources.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: