Key result
DEPS identifies clinical depression at an optimal cut-off score of 11/12.
Why the study?
There is a need for a simple depression questionnaire capable of assessing the severity of depression in primary care patients.
Does the Depression Scale (DEPS) accurately assess the severity of depression compared to the Present State Examination in primary care patients?
Cross-Sectional (n=410)
Does the Depression Scale (DEPS) accurately assess the severity of depression compared to the Present State Examination in primary care patients?
The DEPS questionnaire has some ability to identify the severity of depression in primary care patients, with specific cut-offs for clinical depression.
DEPS may aid limited severity grading in primary care; leaves open validation in larger unscreened cohorts before routine use.
BACKGROUND: There is a need for a simple depression questionnaire also capable of assessing the severity of depression. The Depression Scale (DEPS), has been a very popular self-rating depression questionnaire in Finland for >15 years. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to examine whether the DEPS has the ability to differentiate clearly defined levels of depression in primary care patients. METHODS: Primary care patients aged 18-64 years completed a postal questionnaire including the DEPS. All screen-positive subjects and every 10th screen-negative subject were invited for interview using the Present State Examination (PSE) as the gold standard. Complete DEPS score was available for 410 patients. Descriptive statistics of the DEPS in the six diagnostic PSE classes were computed. Four of the PSE classes were selected for further analyses of depression severity. Receiver Operating Characteristic curves, sensitivity, specificity, ideal cut-off points and area under the curve were calculated. The ability of the DEPS to differentiate levels of functioning was also evaluated. RESULTS: The DEPS identified three groups of patients: those with no psychiatric symptoms, those with some depressive symptoms and those with clinical depression. The margins between the levels were thin: the ideal cut-off point for clinical depression was 11/12 and for any level of depression 9/10. The DEPS was also able to differentiate three levels of functioning. CONCLUSIONS: The DEPS has some ability to identify severity of depression in primary care patients. Further research with larger unscreened material is called for.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Poutanen et al. (2010) conducted a cross-sectional in Depression (n=410). Depression Scale (DEPS) vs. Present State Examination (PSE) was evaluated on Ideal cut-off points for clinical depression and any level of depression. The Depression Scale (DEPS) identified three levels of depression severity, with an ideal cut-off point of 11/12 for clinical depression and 9/10 for any level of depression.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: