Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Chenodeoxycholic acid (cheno) and ursodeoxycholic acid (urso) dissolve cholesterol gallstones in man. Comparative studies of the absorption of cheno and urso are not available. The absorption of urso and cheno and their glycine and taurine conjugates in jejunum, terminal ileum, and colon of the rat were therefore determined in an open in situ perfusion system. Absorption of unconjugated urso and cheno in jejunum, ileum, and colon was similar. In the jejunum conjugated urso and cheno were absorbed only in minimal amounts. In the ileum glycine-conjugated urso was absorbed to a lower extent than glycine-conjugated cheno (6.5 +/- 0.4 vs. 8.6 +/- 0.6 nmol/cm X h at 25 mumol/l bile acid concentration, p less than 0.05) and taurine-conjugated urso was absorbed less than taurine-conjugated cheno (6.4 +/- 0.5 vs. 8.1 +/- 0.7 nmol/cm X h, p less than 0.05). In the colon glycourso and taurourso were not absorbed, while glycocheno and taurocheno were absorbed in small amounts. The low reabsorption rates of urso conjugates in ileum and colon may contribute to the relatively low urso content in bile during urso treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Walker et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: