⌘+K

Pulse Explore Clubs Researchers Journals

Home Clubs Explore

February 1, 2012The American Journal of Gastroenterology

Response to Vakil and Kahrilas

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

No abstract yet

We only have this paper's title and publication details.

Read it at the source→

Abstract

Lacy, Brian E PhD, MD1; Chehade, Robert MD1; Crowell, Michael D PhD1 Author Information

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Lacy et al. (2012) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aab3b9e903ea238faf32143 https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2011.432

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Keep reading

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1A Prospective Study to Compare a Symptom-Based Reflux Disease Questionnaire to 48-h Wireless pH Monitoring for the Identification of Gastroesophageal Reflux (revised 2-26-11)Cohort Study · 2011 · 57 citations
2Development of the GerdQ, a tool for the diagnosis and management of gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease in primary careOriginal Research · 2009 · 728 citations
3Can the Clinical History Distinguish Between Organic and Functional Dyspepsia?Human Clinical Trial · 2006 · 205 citations
4The impact of upper GI endoscopy referral volume on the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease and its complications: a 1-year cross-sectional study in a referral area with 260,000 inhabitantsCross-Sectional Study · 2002 · 50 citations
5Feasibility and tolerability of transnasal/per‐oral placement of the wireless pH capsule vs. traditional 24‐h oesophageal pH monitoring – a randomized trialFeasibility Study · 2005 · 117 citations