Retrospective study identifies radiation dose and cardiovascular risk as predictors of severe urinary toxicity in prostate cancer re-irradiation, suggesting safer dosing thresholds.
Purpose: Predictors of long-term toxicity after prostate cancer re-irradiation are scarce.In this study, we retrospectively assessed the impact of clinical/dosimetric data on late genitourinary (GU) toxicity on fourteen radio-recurrent prostate cancer patients treated with salvage radiotherapy (RT). Material and methods:To identify dose parameters and clinical factors potentially associated to severe long-term GU toxicity, study population was stratified in two groups according to toxicity, including one low-grade group (grade ≤ 2, n = 6) and one high-grade group (grade ≥ 3, n = 8).Dose prescription at primary and salvage-RT in 2 Gy equivalent dose (EQD 2Gy ) per fraction, treatment techniques, and clinical factors potentially associated to severe GU toxicity were analyzed.Results: At salvage-RT, the median EQD 2Gy α/β = 3 Gy was significantly higher in the high-toxicity group (85 Gy, range, 71-85 Gy) compared to the low-toxicity group (77 Gy, range, 61-85 Gy) (p = 0.01).All patients treated using salvage-RT with a brachytherapy (BT) boost and with a baseline Framingham risk-score of > 20% (n = 8) developed severe GU toxicity, while none of the remaining patients developed a grade 3 or more GU toxicity (p = 0.0003).V 70 > 0 and V 75 > 0 of the primary treatment were associated with an increased rate of toxicity.Conclusions: Our analysis shows that the delivery of doses up to 75-80 Gy (EQD 2Gy , α/β = 3 Gy) in salvage-RT can be safe in terms of severe GU toxicity avoidance.Furthermore, concomitant cardiovascular comorbidities seem to increase the risk to develop severe GU toxicity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dipasquale et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: