Key result
Octogenarians undergoing esophagectomy receive ~47% less neoadjuvant therapy and face more severe complications than younger patients.
Why the study?
Surgical intervention in octogenarians carries higher perioperative risks, and literature on esophagectomy outcomes in this population is limited with concerns about withholding surgery.
Does transhiatal esophagectomy in octogenarians compared to younger patients result in worse surgical outcomes?
Cohort (n=143)
Does transhiatal esophagectomy in octogenarians compared to younger patients result in worse surgical outcomes?
Absolute Event Rate: 42.9% vs 80.2%
p-value: p=0.02
Transhiatal esophagectomy can be performed in carefully selected octogenarians but carries a high risk of more severe post-operative complications.
May warrant caution selecting octogenarians for esophagectomy due to severity risk; leaves open neoadjuvant therapy optimization effects.
Background: Surgical intervention in the geriatric population has a higher risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality due to frailty, comorbidities, and lack of compensatory physiologic reserve. The literature on esophagectomy in octogenarians is limited and there is concern about elderly patients being with-held surgery. The purpose of this study is to analyze the outcomes of esophagectomies for esophageal cancer in octogenarians to assess the safety of esophagectomy in this population. Methods: 145 transhiatal esophagectomies performed for esophageal cancer between 2012 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed in this IRB approved study. Two aborted esophagectomies were excluded. Patient demographics, surgical outcomes, and oncologic outcomes were reviewed. The octogenarian group was analyzed compared to patients younger than 80 years of age. Results: Among 143 esophagectomies, 136 patients were <80 years old while 7 were ≥80 years old. Octogenarians received significantly less neoadjuvant therapy compared to younger patients (42.9% vs 80.2%, p = 0.02). No statistically significant difference was noted in complication rate, length of stay (LOS), estimated blood loss (EBL), or mortality. However, octogenarians were found to have an increase in severity of complications compared to younger patients. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that esophagectomy can be performed in carefully selected octogenarians. This comes at a cost with increased severity of complications without an increase in complication rates or mortality. This data suggests that esophagectomy can be offered selectively to older patients with clear expectations and planning for the high risk of more severe post-operative complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ojha et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in esophageal cancer (n=143). Age ≥80 years (octogenarians) vs. Age <80 years was evaluated on Receipt of neoadjuvant therapy (p=0.02). Octogenarians undergoing esophagectomy received less neoadjuvant therapy (42.9% vs 80.2%, p=0.02) and had similar complication rates but increased complication severity compared to younger patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: