Key result
New CBFV pulse onset algorithm achieves ~100% true positive rate with minimal temporal offset.
Why the study?
CBFV waveform analysis via TCD ultrasound depends on reliable pulse onset detection, which is an inherently difficult task.
The proposed algorithm demonstrates highly accurate and reliable identification of CBFV pulse onsets, which may improve waveform analysis and hemodynamic assessment in neurocritical care settings.
New TCD pulse segmentation algorithm may aid CBFV analysis; leaves open clinical validation before routine use.
Transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasound has been demonstrated to be a valuable tool for assessing cerebral hemodynamics via measurement of cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV), with a number of established clinical indications. However, CBFV waveform analysis depends on reliable pulse onset detection, an inherently difficult task for CBFV signals acquired via TCD. We study the application of a new algorithm for CBFV pulse segmentation, which locates pulse onsets in a sequential manner using a moving difference filter and adaptive thresholding. The test data set used in this study consists of 92,012 annotated CBFV pulses, whose quality is representative of real world data. On this test set, the algorithm achieves a true positive rate of 99.998% (2 false negatives), positive predictive value of 99.998% (2 false positives), and mean temporal offset error of 6.10 ± 4.75 ms. We do note that in this context, the way in which true positives, false positives, and false negatives are defined caries some nuance, so care should be taken when drawing comparisons to other algorithms. Additionally, we find that 97.8% and 99.5% of onsets are detected within 10 and 30 ms, respectively, of the true onsets. The algorithm's performance in spite of the large degree of variation in signal quality and waveform morphology present in the test data suggests that it may serve as a valuable tool for the accurate and reliable identification of CBFV pulse onsets in neurocritical care settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Canac et al. (2019) studied Subarachnoid hemorrhage (n=108). Pulse onset detection algorithm (MDF and adaptive thresholding) vs. Manual annotations (ground truth) was evaluated on True positive rate (TPR) for pulse onset detection. The new pulse onset detection algorithm achieved a true positive rate of 99.998% and a positive predictive value of 99.998% with a mean temporal offset error of 6.10 ms on 92,012 annotated CBFV pulses.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: