Key result
Binodal disease linked to ~62% longer indirect sinus node recovery time versus non-binodal disease.
Why the study?
The clinical significance and electrophysiological characteristics of binodal disease, the coexistence of atrioventricular conduction disturbances with sick sinus syndrome, remain unknown.
What are the clinical and electrophysiological characteristics of binodal disease compared to non-binodal disease in patients with sick sinus syndrome?
Observational (n=107)
No
What are the clinical and electrophysiological characteristics of binodal disease compared to non-binodal disease in patients with sick sinus syndrome?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Binodal disease in patients with sick sinus syndrome is associated with widespread atrial conduction disturbances and a higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation, suggesting it should be categorized as severe sick sinus syndrome.
BACKGROUND: Although coexistence of atrioventricular conduction disturbances with sick sinus syndrome (SSS), so-called binodal disease (BND), is a frequently encountered disorder, its clinical significance and electrophysiological characteristics remain unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred and seven patients with SSS were divided into BND (n=30) and N-BND groups (n=77). Sinus cycle length, sinus node recovery time (SRT), sino-atrial conduction time (SACT), the number of isolated sinus node electrograms, atrio-His (AH) interval, His-ventricular (HV) interval, intra-atrial conduction time (PA intervals) and QRS width were measured. In addition, the prevalence of bundle-branch block was obtained. The parameters of sino-atrial and intra-atrial conduction were significantly longer in the BND group: SRT (5,070+/-2,628 vs 3,122+/-1,856 ms, p<0.05), SACT (115+/-30 vs 87+/-21 ms, p<0.05), PA intervals (56+/-13 vs 41+/-8 ms, p<0.05). The BND group was more likely to have atrial fibrillation than the N-BND group (83.3% vs 53.2%, p<0.01). HV interval, QRS width and the prevalence of associated bundle-branch block did not differ between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: BND patients not only had sino-atrial and atrioventricular node dysfunction, but also widespread atrial conduction disturbances. Thus, in the clinical setting BND should be categorized as severe SSS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sakai et al. (2006) conducted an observational in Sick sinus syndrome (n=107). Binodal disease vs. Non-binodal disease was evaluated on Indirect sinus node recovery time (SRTi) (p=<0.05). Binodal disease was associated with significantly longer indirect sinus node recovery time (5,070 vs 3,122 ms), sino-atrial conduction time, and PA intervals compared to non-binodal disease.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: