Why the study?
Awareness of sex disparities in AF and AFL treatment has grown, but long-term evaluation of sex-specific treatment standards for acute AF/AFL is needed to ensure equitable care.
Does sex affect the time to restoration of sinus rhythm and success rates in patients with acute atrial fibrillation or flutter in the emergency department?
Cohort (n=3,661)
No
Does sex affect the time to restoration of sinus rhythm and success rates in patients with acute atrial fibrillation or flutter in the emergency department?
A sex gap in the success rates and time to restoration of sinus rhythm for acute AF/AFL in the emergency department has re-emerged after 2016, highlighting the need to re-evaluate sex-specific treatment protocols.
Sex disparity in acute AF rhythm control after 2016 may signal need for tailored ED protocols; leaves open whether guideline updates contributed.
Background/Objectives: In recent years, awareness of sex disparities in atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL) has grown, resulting in significant advancements in sex-specific treatment strategies. As these treatment approaches continue to evolve, it is essential to remain attentive to sex-related issues to ensure equitable care for all patients, a point first emphasised by the 2016 AF guidelines. Our objective was the long-term evaluation of sex-specific treatment standards for acute AF/AFL. Methods: This cohort study included cases of acute AF/AFL treated in the emergency department of the Medical University of Vienna, Austria, between 2012 and 2022. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to analyse time-to-event data. The effect of sex on the time to restoration of sinus rhythm was assessed using the log-rank test for unadjusted models and the likelihood ratio test for adjusted models. The groups were categorised based on cases occurring before and after 2016. Results: A total of 3661 cases (55.7% male) were analysed. Before 2016, sinus rhythm was achieved in 70.8% of males and 71.2% of females; after 2016, these rates were 71.8% and 68.6%, respectively. The adjusted model showed a significant effect of sex on the time to restoration of sinus rhythm after 2016 (p = 0.013) but not before (p = 0.865). A subgroup analysis indicated similar results for pharmacologic rhythm control (p = 0.035 vs. p = 0.193). A sensitivity analysis confirmed robustness, with similar effects in both models. The success rate of pharmacological cardioversion was lower in women than in men but was used more frequently in women after 2016. Conclusions: The re-emergence of a sex gap in success rates and time to restoration of sinus rhythm in emergency treatment for acute AF/AFL is concerning and necessitates a re-evaluation of treatment protocols, improved decision-making processes, and further research to ensure equitable, effective, and safe emergency care for all patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gupta et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in acute atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter (n=3,661). Female sex vs. Male sex was evaluated on time to restoration of sinus rhythm after 2016 (p=0.013).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: