Why the study?
As DCD heart transplantation becomes more widely adopted, there is a need to establish the most clinically effective method of organ procurement.
Does organ procurement using taNRP improve outcomes compared to DPP in patients undergoing DCD heart transplantation?
Observational (n=504)
Yes
Does organ procurement using taNRP improve outcomes compared to DPP in patients undergoing DCD heart transplantation?
In DCD heart transplantation, organ procurement using taNRP is associated with significantly lower rates of severe primary graft dysfunction and acute cellular rejection compared to DPP, with comparable 1-year survival.
BACKGROUND: As donation after circulatory determination of death (DCD) heart transplantation (HT) becomes more widely adopted, there is a need to establish the most clinically effective method of organ procurement. OBJECTIVES: This international, multicenter study compares outcomes of DCD HT across Europe and the United States between recipients whose donor hearts were retrieved using thoraco-abdominal normothermic regional perfusion (taNRP) with those whose hearts were recovered using direct procurement and perfusion (DPP). METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study across 22 heart transplant centers in Belgium, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States. This study included all patients undergoing DCD HT at participating centers, from the start of each center's DCD program through January 1, 2023. DCD HT with recovery using either taNRP or DPP were compared with one another. Posttransplant outcomes included: 1) survival at 1 year; 2) incidence of severe primary graft dysfunction (PGD); and 3) episodes of treated, biopsy-proven acute-cellular rejection (ACR) in the first year following transplantation. RESULTS: A total of 504 DCD HTs took place in the study period. Survival at 1 year was similar for taNRP and DPP recipients (91% vs 88%; P = 0.100). taNRP recipients had a lower rate of severe PGD (7.6% vs 19.2%; P < 0.001) and fewer episodes of biopsy-proven, ACR requiring treatment in the first year post-transplantation (13% vs 25%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In an international study of DCD HT, recipients of hearts retrieved by taNRP technique had lower rates of severe PGD and fewer episodes of biopsy-proven ACR in the first year when compared with those retrieved by using DPP. These results should be further investigated with randomized control trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Louca et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Donation after circulatory determination of death (DCD) heart transplantation (n=504). Thoraco-abdominal normothermic regional perfusion (taNRP) vs. Direct procurement and perfusion (DPP) was evaluated on Survival at 1 year (p=0.100).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: