Key result
Higher contact exposure in rugby forwards is linked to greater cerebrovascular reactivity decline versus backs.
Why the study?
The impact of recurrent contact events during a professional rugby union season on molecular, cerebrovascular, and cognitive function was unclear.
Does a season of professional rugby union impair cerebrovascular and cognitive function through oxidative-nitrosative stress?
Cohort (n=21)
Does a season of professional rugby union impair cerebrovascular and cognitive function through oxidative-nitrosative stress?
A season of professional rugby union increases systemic oxidative-nitrosative stress and reduces cerebrovascular function and cognition, particularly in forwards who experience more contact events.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May signal OXNOS elevation in contact athletes; leaves open cerebrovascular and cognitive sequelae pending longitudinal data.
New Findings What is the central question of this study? How does recurrent contact incurred across a season of professional rugby union impact molecular, cerebrovascular and cognitive function? What is the main findings and its importance? A single season of professional rugby union increases systemic oxidative–nitrosative stress (OXNOS) confirmed by a free radical‐mediated suppression in nitric oxide bioavailability. Forwards encountered a higher frequency of contact events compared to backs, exhibiting elevated OXNOS and lower cerebrovascular function and cognition. Collectively, these findings provide mechanistic insight into the possible cause of reduced cognition in rugby union subsequent to impairment in the redox regulation of cerebrovascular function. Abstract Contact events in rugby union remain a public health concern. We determined the molecular, cerebrovascular and cognitive consequences of contact events during a season of professional rugby. Twenty‐one male players aged 25 (mean) ± 4 (SD) years were recruited from a professional rugby team comprising forwards ( n = 13) and backs ( n = 8). Data were collected across the season. Pre‐ and post‐season, venous blood was assayed for the ascorbate free radical (A •– , electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy) and nitric oxide (NO, reductive ozone‐based chemiluminescence) to quantify oxidative–nitrosative stress (OXNOS). Middle cerebral artery velocity (MCAv, Doppler ultrasound) was measured to assess cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR), and cognition was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Notational analysis determined contact events over the season. Forwards incurred more collisions (Mean difference [ M D ] 7.49; 95% CI, 2.58–12.40; P = 0.005), tackles ( M D 3.49; 95% CI, 0.42–6.56; P = 0.028) and jackals ( M D 2.21; 95% CI, 0.18–4.24; P = 0.034). Forwards suffered five concussions while backs suffered one concussion. An increase in systemic OXNOS, confirmed by elevated A •– ( F 2,19 = 10.589, P = 0.004) and corresponding suppression of NO bioavailability ( F 2,19 = 11.492, P = 0.003) was apparent in forwards and backs across the season. This was accompanied by a reduction in cerebral oxygen delivery ( , F 2,19 = 9.440, P = 0.006) and cognition ( F 2,19 = 4.813, P = 0.041). Forwards exhibited a greater decline in the cerebrovascular reactivity range to changes in PET CO2 ( compared to backs ( M D 1.378; 95% CI, 0.74–2.02; P < 0.001).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Owens et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Professional rugby players (contact events) (n=21). Contact events (playing as a forward) vs. Playing as a back (fewer contact events) was evaluated on Decline in cerebrovascular reactivity range to changes in PET CO2 (MD 1.378, 95% CI 0.74-2.02, p=<0.001). Professional rugby forwards, who incurred more contact events, exhibited a greater decline in cerebrovascular reactivity range across a season compared to backs (MD 1.378; 95% CI 0.74-2.02; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: