Key result
Graded calf compression stockings fail to improve orthostatic tolerance versus placebo in healthy volunteers.
Why the study?
Research confirming the efficacy of compression stockings for managing syncope due to orthostatic intolerance is lacking.
Do graded calf compression stockings improve orthostatic tolerance in healthy volunteers?
RCT (n=15)
Double-blind
Randomized, cross-over
No
Do graded calf compression stockings improve orthostatic tolerance in healthy volunteers?
Absolute Event Rate: 26% vs 29.3%
p-value: p=not significant
Graded calf compression stockings did not significantly improve orthostatic tolerance compared to placebo stockings in healthy volunteers, questioning their routine use for orthostatic intolerance without individualizing for anthropometric variables.
Graded calf compression stockings did not improve orthostatic tolerance versus placebo; leaves open individualized use guided by anthropometrics in syncope.
BACKGROUND: Syncope, or fainting, affects approximately 6.2% of the population, and is associated with significant comorbidity. Many syncopal events occur secondary to excessive venous pooling and capillary filtration in the lower limbs when upright. As such, a common approach to the management of syncope is the use of compression stockings. However, research confirming their efficacy is lacking. We aimed to investigate the effect of graded calf compression stockings on orthostatic tolerance. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We evaluated orthostatic tolerance (OT) and haemodynamic control in 15 healthy volunteers wearing graded calf compression stockings compared to two placebo stockings in a randomized, cross-over, double-blind fashion. OT (time to presyncope, min) was determined using combined head-upright tilting and lower body negative pressure applied until presyncope. Throughout testing we continuously monitored beat-to-beat blood pressures, heart rate, stroke volume and cardiac output (finger plethysmography), cerebral and forearm blood flow velocities (Doppler ultrasound) and breath-by-breath end tidal gases. There were no significant differences in OT between compression stocking (26.0±2.3 min) and calf (29.3±2.4 min) or ankle (27.6±3.1 min) placebo conditions. Cardiovascular, cerebral and respiratory responses were similar in all conditions. The efficacy of compression stockings was related to anthropometric parameters, and could be predicted by a model based on the subject's calf circumference and shoe size (r = 0.780, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: These data question the use of calf compression stockings for orthostatic intolerance and highlight the need for individualised therapy accounting for anthropometric variables when considering treatment with compression stockings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Protheroe et al. (2011) conducted an RCT in Orthostatic Presyncope (n=15). Graded calf compression stockings vs. Calf placebo stocking and ankle placebo stocking was evaluated on Orthostatic tolerance (time to presyncope in minutes) (p=not significant). Graded calf compression stockings did not significantly improve orthostatic tolerance compared to placebo stockings in healthy volunteers undergoing orthostatic stress testing.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: