Key result
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) significantly reduced concomitant moderate-to-severe mitral regurgitation at 1 month (mean decrease 0.464, p<0.0001), with benefits persisting up to 2 years.
Why the study?
Previous studies suggested concomitant mitral regurgitation is a risk factor for acute TAVI failure but may improve afterwards, requiring further assessment of its prevalence, clinical impact, and changes post-TAVI.
Does TAVI improve concomitant mitral regurgitation in patients undergoing the procedure?
Cohort (n=165)
Single-blind
Yes
Does TAVI improve concomitant mitral regurgitation in patients undergoing the procedure?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
TAVI effectively treats the aortic valve and persistently improves concomitant moderate-to-severe mitral regurgitation without increasing acute procedural risk.
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested that concomitant mitral regurgitation (MR) is a risk factor for acute transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) failure, but may improve afterwards. Aim of this study was to assess the prevalence, clinical meaning and modifications of MR in patients undergoing TAVI. METHODS: In a retrospective, two-center (Potenza-San Carlo and Roma- San Camillo) study, from January 2010 to June 2014 we enrolled 165 consecutive patients (age =80 ± 5 years, 74 males, Ejection Fraction 51 ± 9 %) referred for TAVI with either Medtronic Core-ReValving System (in 114 patients, 69%) or balloon-expandable Edwards SAPIEN/SAPIEN XT (in 51 patients, 31%). All patients underwent TTE and TEE assessment of MR (from 1, mild to 4 = severe according to ESC latest guidelines) with core lab reading by a single observer blinded to patient identity and status. Assessment was performed at baseline (24 h prior to intervention) and at 1, 6, 12 and 24 months. RESULTS: Mild-to-Moderate MR (grade 1-2) was present in 137 patients and Moderate-to-Severe MR (grade 3-4) was present in 28 patients. No significant differences were seen comparing perioperative mortality and morbidity between the two groups. In the group of preoperative MR grade 3-4 the mean decrease from MR pre-TAVI to MR at 1 month post-TAVI was 0.464 (p < 0.0001) and this improvement was persistent at 6 months (p < 0.0001) and at 12 months (p < 0.0001), with partial benefit loss at 1 and 2 years. The mean difference from Left Atrial volume post-TAVI at 1 month was 16.5 ml (p < 0.0001) and this improvement was persistent at 12 months 12.12 ml (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: TAVI effectively treats the aortic valve but as a beneficial by product also ameliorates concomitant MR. The presence of moderate-to-severe MR does not increase the acute risk of failure of TAVI. In successful procedures, the MR improves immediately and persistently.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Costantino et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in Severe aortic stenosis with concomitant mitral regurgitation (n=165). Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) vs. Baseline (pre-TAVI) was evaluated on Change in mitral regurgitation grade at 1 month post-TAVI in patients with baseline moderate-to-severe (grade 3-4) mitral regurgitation (mean decrease 0.464, p=<0.0001). Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) significantly reduced concomitant moderate-to-severe mitral regurgitation at 1 month (mean decrease 0.464, p<0.0001), with benefits persisting up to 2 years.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: