Key result
Drug-induced bradyarrhythmia hospitalizations jump ~6-fold, mostly involving multiple bradycardic drugs.
Why the study?
The medical and social significance of drug-induced bradyarrhythmia (DIB) and its clinical characteristics, causes, and outcomes over time were not well characterized.
Observational (n=325)
No
Hospitalizations for drug-induced bradyarrhythmia are increasing significantly, often driven by polypharmacy with bradycardic agents and resulting in substantial morbidity and a 6.2% mortality rate.
Highlights increasing drug-induced bradyarrhythmia burden from polypharmacy; leaves open optimal prevention strategies pending randomized data.
Aim.To analyze hospitalizations due to drug-induced bradyarrhythmia (DIB) over a 5-year period (2014-2018), its clinical characteristics, causes and outcomes. Material and methods. The analysis included all hospitalizations due to DIB at the Ryazan Regional Vascular Center in 2017 and 2018 and retrospectively in 2014. Results.A total of 325 cases of DIB were included in the analysis (age 76,0 [68.0; 82.0] years; men — 26,1%). The proportion of DIB as a hospitalization cause in 2017 increased by 4,3 times compared to 2014 (p<0,001), in 2018 compared to 2014 — by 6,3 times (p<0,001) and compared to 2017 — by 46,2% (p=0,001). We recorded the following manifestations of DIB: bradycardia (<40 bpm — 51,4%), atrioventricular (31,7%) and sinoatrial (29,2%) block, syncope (36,0%), Frederick’s syndrome (8,6%), pauses >3 s (5,9%). Management in intensive care was required in 42,2% of patients, temporary cardiac pacing — in 7,7%, permanent pacemaker — in 6,2%. Mortality rate was 6,2%. Before hospitalization, patients took beta-blockers (65,1%), antiarrhythmic agents (39,6%), cardiac glycosides (23,0%), ^-imidazoline receptor agonist moxonidine (13,5%, its prescription rate increased 8,9 times over 5 years, p=0,004), nondihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (7,9%), and other drugs (15,4%). In 60,1% of patients, ≥2 drugs with bradycardic action were used, in 22,0% — ≥3, in 8,1% — ≥4, in 10,6% — with an excessive single/daily dose. Conclusion.The medical and social significance of DIB have been demonstrated. DIB due to exceeding the recommended dose was associated with independent try of patients to manage the deterioration. In other cases, DIB was due to the summation/ potentiation of several drugs’ action, the comorbidities contributing to the development of bradyarrhythmia and/or changes in pharmacokinetic properties of drugs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Никулина et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Drug-induced bradyarrhythmia (n=325). Bradycardic drugs was evaluated on Hospitalization due to drug-induced bradyarrhythmia. Hospitalizations for drug-induced bradyarrhythmia increased 6.3-fold from 2014 to 2018 (p<0.001), with 60.1% of cases involving the use of ≥2 bradycardic drugs and a 6.2% mortality rate.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: