Key result
TMAO levels fail to differentiate symptomatic from asymptomatic cerebrovascular atherosclerosis.
Why the study?
It was unclear whether TMAO levels differ between symptomatic and asymptomatic cerebrovascular atherosclerosis patients.
Are TMAO levels different in symptomatic versus asymptomatic cerebrovascular atherosclerosis?
Case-Control (n=82)
No
Are TMAO levels different in symptomatic versus asymptomatic cerebrovascular atherosclerosis?
TMAO levels on admission do not differentiate between symptomatic and asymptomatic cerebrovascular atherosclerosis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Does not support TMAO for differentiating cerebrovascular atherosclerosis risk; leaves open its prognostic value in prospective cohorts.
Introduction: Trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO) is correlated with atherosclerosis and vascular diseases such as coronary heart disease and ischemic stroke. The aim of the study was to investigate whether TMAO levels are different in symptomatic vs. asymptomatic cerebrovascular atherosclerosis. Methods: This was a prospective, case–control study, conducted at a tertiary care university hospital. Patients were included if they had large-artery atherosclerosis (TOAST criteria). Symptomatic patients with ischemic stroke were compared with asymptomatic patients. As primary endpoint, TMAO levels on admission were compared between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Univariable analysis was performed using Mann–Whitney U test and multivariable analysis using binary logistic regression. TMAO values were adjusted for glomerular filtration rate (GFR), age, and smoking. Results: Between 2018 and 2020, 82 symptomatic and asymptomatic patients were recruited. Median age was 70 years; 65% were male. Comparing symptomatic (n = 42) and asymptomatic (n = 40) patients, no significant differences were found in univariable analysis in TMAO [3.96 (IQR 2.30–6.73) vs. 5.36 (3.59–8.68) μmol/L; p = 0.055], GFR [87 (72–97) vs. 82 (71–90) ml/min*1.73 m2; p = 0.189] and age [71 (60–79) vs. 69 (67–75) years; p = 0.756]. In multivariable analysis, TMAO was not a predictor of symptomatic cerebrovascular disease after adjusting for age and GFR [OR 1.003 (95% CI: 0.941–1.070); p = 0.920]. In a sensitivity analysis, we only analyzed patients with symptomatic stenosis and excluded patients with occlusion of brain-supplying arteries. Again, TMAO was not a significant predictor of symptomatic stenosis [OR 1.039 (0.965–1.120), p = 0.311]. Conclusion: TMAO levels could not be used to differentiate between symptomatic and asymptomatic cerebrovascular disease in our study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heyse et al. (2021) conducted a case-control in Cerebrovascular atherosclerosis (n=82). Symptomatic cerebrovascular atherosclerosis vs. Asymptomatic cerebrovascular atherosclerosis was evaluated on TMAO levels on admission (OR 1.003, 95% CI 0.941-1.070, p=0.920). TMAO levels did not significantly differentiate between patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic cerebrovascular atherosclerosis after adjusting for age and GFR (OR 1.003).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: