Key result
Higher diligence linked to ~12% lower incident MI risk, whereas nervousness increases risk.
Why the study?
Personality has been linked to cardiovascular diseases but reports on its mediating role are inconsistent and large population-based cohort data are lacking.
Do specific personality traits influence the risk of myocardial infarction in a large population-based cohort?
Cohort (n=484,205)
Yes
Do specific personality traits influence the risk of myocardial infarction in a large population-based cohort?
Hazard Ratio: 0.88 (95% CI 0.85–0.92)
p-value: p=1.43 x 10^-11
Personality traits such as diligence and sociability are associated with a lower risk of myocardial infarction, while nervousness is associated with an increased risk.
Supports personality-MI associations in large cohorts; leaves open causality and whether trait-targeted interventions alter incidence.
Personality is a strong determinant for several health-related behaviours and has been linked to the development of cardiovascular diseases. However, the reports of personality's mediating role have been inconsistent with no data available from large population-based cohorts. The study aimed to create proxies for the Big Five personality traits, extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, openness and neuroticism, to examine the longitudinal relationship between personality and myocardial infarction in the UK Biobank. The study sample comprised of 484,205 participants (55% female, 45% male, mean age 56.4 ± 8.1 years) from UK Biobank cohort with a mean follow-up of 7 years. The personality proxies sociability, warmth, diligence, curiosity and nervousness were created using self-reported data on psychological factors, mental health and social support, to match the facets of the Big Five traits. As neuroticism is the only Big Five personality trait available in the UK Biobank, it was included to validate the personality proxies. Myocardial infarction outcome information was collected from hospital records, death registries or was self-reported. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard regression were used to estimate odds ratio (OR) and hazard ratios (HR), respectively with 95% confidence intervals (CI) adjusted for demographics (age, sex, socioeconomic status, ethnicity), health-related factors (BMI, diabetes, systolic and diastolic blood pressure) and lifestyle factors (alcohol intake, smoking, and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity). Diligence was found to be significantly associated with lower prevalent myocardial infarction [OR: 0.87; (CI 0.84-0.89)] and lower incident myocardial infarction [HR: 0.88; (CI 0.85-0.92)]. Sociability was also protective against prevalent [OR: 0.89; (CI 0.87-0.92)] and incident [HR: 0.90; (CI 0.87-0.93)] myocardial infarction. Conversely, nervousness inferred a higher risk for both prevalent [OR: 1.10; (CI 1.08-1.12)] and incident [HR: 1.07; (CI 1.04-1.09)] myocardial infarction during follow-up. Sex-stratified analyses revealed that nervousness significantly increases the risk for incident myocardial infarction among women [HR: 1.13; (CI 1.08-1.19)] compared to men [HR: 1.05; (CI 1.02-1.08)]. By using our created proxies, we were able to investigate the impact of personality on the development of myocardial infarction. Persons with higher levels of diligence and sociability mimicking predominantly conscientiousness and extraversion personalities respectively are less likely to experience myocardial infarction, while personalities predominantly characterised by nervousness pose higher risk for developing myocardial infarction. These initial findings invite further validation of the use of the personality proxies in UK Biobank cohort.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dahlén et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Myocardial infarction (n=484,205). Diligence (personality trait proxy) vs. Lower levels of diligence was evaluated on Incident myocardial infarction (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.85-0.92, p=1.43 x 10^-11). Higher levels of diligence were significantly associated with a lower risk of incident myocardial infarction (HR 0.88), whereas nervousness increased the risk (HR 1.07).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: